Re: [nc-deletes] Draft Final Report

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>]

Jordyn,

Looks good. There are a couple of small changes I would suggest.

Our list archive broke. As a result we now have two archives and should
make note of both in the first paragraph under 6. Outreach Efforts.

http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-deletes/Arc00/
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-deletes/Arc01/

There are two instances in the report where the DNSO is referred to. The
first is in the first paragraph of 1.1 in relation to the Transfers TF,
which may be appropriate since it was convened under the DNSO. However, the
second instance, in the second paragraph of 6, should probably be changed
to GNSO.

Tim


 -------- Original Message --------
   Subject: [nc-deletes] Draft Final Report
   From: "Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jbuchanan@Registrypro.com>
   Date: Wed, March 19, 2003 9:18 pm
   To: nc-deletes@dnso.org

   Hello all:

   Because I spent much of today traveling, this ends up being a day
   late.
     Hopefully we'll still have time to get it finalized.  A summary of
   changes:

   1) Inserted public comment notes.  I accepted most of Tim's edits and
   added a few sentences of my own with regards to Danny Younger's
   comment. 2) Changed the recommendations in section 3.1 as we discussed
   on
   Tuesday's call, and also added some commentary to the discussion of
   Issue 1 in order to describe the new requirement about RGP pricing. 3)
   Added commentary about the registrars desire for auto-renew to be
   moved to the end of the 45 day grace period to the discussion of Issue
    #3.
   4) Modified the voting section.

   Please let me know if you see any problems with the new draft, so we
   can get them incorporated immediately.  If not, hopefully we can vote
   and get this published right away.

   Thanks everyone for all your time and energy getting us this far,

   Jordyn