Re: [nc-intake] Re: NC agenda

[Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>]

All,

Is the NC agenda and its references (URLs) in:
   http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20001219.NCtelecon-agenda.html
correct ? Anything missing ? Not too many URLs ?

To "Budget report" I added an URL to the current DNSO budget contributions
as provided yesterday by Louis (correcting Total Requested bottom line
from $18 K to $130 K, as a trivial mistake).

To "La followup on WhoIs" I added an URL to ICANN web page, as provided
by Louis, and including relevant information.

Accordingly to the Intake instructions, the agenda will be sent out to
various DNSO mailing lists later today, 7 December.

Elisabeth

> From Elisabeth.Porteneuve@balsa.cetp.ipsl.fr Wed Dec  6 17:45 MET 2000
> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 17:45:21 +0100 (MET)
> From: Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> Message-Id: <200012061645.RAA28694@balsa.cetp.ipsl.fr>
> To: Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr, kstubbs@digitel.net, mchicoine@pol.net,
>         philip.sheppard@aim.be
> Cc: nc-intake@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [nc-intake] Re: NC agenda
> 
> 
> Caroline,
> 
> You will have the NC agenda and existing URLs ready on the website
> tonight my time. 
> Best,
> Elisabeth
> 
> --
> > From mchicoine@pol.net Wed Dec  6 17:24 MET 2000
> > Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 11:21:31 -0500 (EST)
> > Message-Id: <200012061621.LAA28489@web3.po.com>
> > X-Authentication-Warning: web3.po.com: www set sender to mchicoine@pol.net using -f
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > From: Michael Chicoine <mchicoine@pol.net>
> > To: kstubbs@digitel.net (Digitel - Ken Stubbs),
> >         "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>,
> >         "Elisabeth DNSO Sec" <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> > Subject: Re: [nc-intake] Re: NC agenda
> > Cc: "DNSO Intake" <nc-intake@dnso.org>
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > 
> > Elizabeth, is it possible to put a link to YJ's current draft of the 
> > proposed WG so everyone has it handy and makes sure to read it before 
> > the call?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------ Reply Separator --------------------
> > Originally From: kstubbs@digitel.net (Digitel - Ken Stubbs)
> > Subject: [nc-intake] Re: NC agenda
> > Date: 12/05/2000 07:14pm
> > 
> > 
> > i am good with this. there is a small chance that i may not be able to 
> > make the meeting though. if i cannot then i will ask caroline & philip 
> > to co-chair and i will provide my proxy to the appropriate person
> > 
> > ken
> >   ----- Original Message ----- 
> >   From: Philip Sheppard 
> >   To: Ken Stubbs Reg ; Elisabeth DNSO Sec 
> >   Cc: DNSO Intake 
> >   Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 10:39 AM
> >   Subject: NC agenda
> > 
> > 
> >   Ken, the Intake Committee based on input received proposes the 
> > following agenda for the next NC. It is quite long and tabled items 
> > currently occupy 90 of the 120 minutes. Items are in order of priority 
> > wrt need for decisions.
> >   Philip.
> >   -------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> >   Agenda NC 19 December 2000 version 3 (120 mins) 
> > 
> >   Timeline
> >   Agenda input closes 29 November
> >   IC submits draft agenda to chair latest 6 December
> >   Chair amends/approves and Secretary posts to NC latest 7 December
> >   Agenda item documents sent to NC latest 13 December
> > 
> >   1. Approval of the agenda (Ken Stubbs) - 2 min
> > 
> >   2. Approval of the summary of the meeting 19 October and  14 
> > November (Ken Stubbs) - 3 min
> > 
> >   3. Matters arising from the summary of 19 October and 14 November 
> > (not forming part of this agenda) (Ken Stubbs) - 5 min
> > 
> >   4. Secretarial support DNSO prior to recruitment of permanent staff 
> > and Openness and recording of NC meetings.
> >   - Status of AFNIC support (Elizabeth Porteneuve)
> >   - Recording secretary - discussion of objective, value added and 
> > cost - (Philip Sheppard) - 15 mins. 
> >   - Alternatives - taping of NC meetings (Ken Stubbs)
> >   - Taping, web casting, listening lines (Ken Stubbs)
> > 
> > 
> >   5. LA follow up - Business Plan (Philip Sheppard /Erica Roberts) - 
> > 10  mins
> > 
> >   6. LA follow-up - proposed "Review Working Group"  (YJ - 20 mins)
> >   - clarification of original intent of Chicoine proposal (Caroline 
> > Chicoine )
> >   - decision on new terms of reference / relationship to NC task force
> >   - decision on chair or co-chairs
> >   - decision on membership
> >   - decision on life time of WG
> >   - decision on name
> > 
> >   7. New TLDs
> >   - Update on negotiations on new TLDs (ICANN staff) - 5 min
> >   - charter enforcement (Philip Sheppard - 5 mins)
> > 
> >   8. LA follow-up - Who Is? (YJ) - 5 mins
> >   - is the informal ICANN staff committee only technical or are there 
> > policy issues involved ?
> > 
> >   9. Budget Committee - status report (Roger Cochetti) - 5 min
> > 
> >   10. Independent Review Panel nomination committee proposals - status 
> > report
> >   (Ken Stubbs/Caroline Chicoine) - 5 min
> > 
> >   11. Request from GA for NC to consider an Individuals Constituency 
> > (YJ) 5 mins (see supporting document from Ken Stubbs)
> > 
> >   12. Duke University Law Report (Peter de Blanc) 5  mins
> >   - is there a need for a ICANN reply ?
> > 
> >   13. Any new business
> > 
> >   (Allocated items time 90 mins)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>