ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-review] NC review -- Draft Criteria for new Constituencies


Axel, and all. Your document is GREAT!

However, all constituency members are members of the GA- so I believe
the term "General Assembly" at the end of line # 7 should be taken out.

Peter de Blanc

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nc-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-nc-review@dnso.org] On
Behalf Of aus der Muhlen, Axel
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 8:32 PM
To: 'Philip Sheppard'
Cc: NC Review
Subject: [nc-review] NC review -- Draft Criteria for new Constituencies




Philip,

Following below is a first draft of criteria (which are put in the form
of questions) for new constituencies.  I will post the text also to the
virtual workroom.

Axel
(snip)

7.  How much overlap in membership is there likely to be between the
proposed new constituency and existing constituencies, or the General
Assembly?
  





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>