Re: [nc-transfer] Fw: TTF

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

It's a small point, but the rev'd question goes to the "concern" that the
registrant may have instead of the "possibility" as that the original does.
I'm okay to change it, but I believe that the rev'n is less precise - so
let's at least change it with a thought to what we are actually changing it
to...

-rwr

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Steinberg" <synthesis@videotron.ca>
To: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
Cc: "Nick Wood" <nick.wood@nom-iq.com>; <nc-transfer@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [nc-transfer] Fw: TTF


Ok...this got me thinking so I went to re-read Nick's suggestions in
light of Ross's comments...


8) Do you think that it is possible to lose your name if you transfer to
another registrar or supplier? I suggest rewording: Are you concerned
about the possibility of losing your name(s)..etc

    [ ] Yes
    [ ] No
    [ ] Don't know

I dont see such a difference between 'concerned about the possibility of
losing your names' and "do you think its possible to lose your
name(s)'....

how does one pre-suppose and the other not?  I dont see one as providing
a moot answer and the other not.

if you 'think its possible' you are equally assuming the the process is
insecure...in fact..splitting hairs...I would suggest that the phrase
'are you concerned' could be construed as less assuming the process is
insecure.



"Ross Wm. Rader" wrote:
>
> Nick - some great suggestions here. Specifically as it relates to your
> suggested change for question number 8, the reworded question is in fact a
> different question than what we have proposed. The original question talks
> specifically to the transferor's perception of the security/integrity of
the
> process whereas yours assumes that the process is insecure and questions
the
> level/existence of concern about the perceived lack of integrity
surrounding
> the process.
>
> It would be my preference to pursue answers to the original question and
not
> the latter as I think it is a safe presumption that if a transferor can
> possibly lose their domain name during a transaction that they would be
(to
> some degree) concerned about that reality - in essence, your revised
> question produces a moot answer based on a pre-supposed condition (that I
> would argue should not be pre-supposed).
>
> ??
>
> -rwr
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nick Wood" <nick.wood@nom-iq.com>
> To: <nc-transfer@dnso.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 4:12 PM
> Subject: [nc-transfer] Fw: TTF
>
> > Here are some thoughts on the TTF Questionnaire. Thanks for all the hard
> > work in drafting that those responsible have done.
> >
> > Nick Wood
> >