RE: [nc-transfer] Latest IRDX Draft and Status Update - tomorrow's agenda

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

Ross, I'll put your report on the agenda as our primary activity for tomorrow's call. 

Will Mark present the "standardized definitions"?

Team: some time ago, we discussed making recommendations on how to handle what the 
TF would say about apparent authority, based on earlier briefings/discussion with
ICANN Staff. We will spend some time on how to document that, so it can go in the
draft report. 

I also want to make some assignments on gathering the documentation for the draft
report so that everyone has a chance to contribute to the drafting. That way, we
have broad contributions.

AND DISCUSS/SCHEDULE TWO "OPEN/OUTREACH" CALLS ON THE DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS BETWEEN NOW AND THE END OF SEPT.

Finally, I'd like to develop more fully, what a possible Transfer public forum discussion  might look like
for Shanghai, how much time, etc., so we can discuss it with Stuart Lynn. 

David Safran/Ross: separate requests for you:
David, would you repost your submission on "standard deletions" to Bruce Tonkin, cc'd above. Bruce is the 
new NC chair. 

Ross: would you repost to the group your suggestion/recommendation that you made during our WLS drafting
that the TF recommend to the NC that the Board should establish a standard consensus policy related to 
new registry services. We discussed that very briefly; did not vote on it to include it in the WLS report;
but it remains an item which the TF should consider and either forward to the NC as a recommendation 
to pass along to the Board, or we should close the issue out. 
THIS IS NOT ABOUT THIS TF DOING ANY WORK ON THIS ISSUE; IT IS ABOUT 
PROVIDING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE NC THAT WE THINK WORK SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. It is an effort to close out
some pending items.  :-)



-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 8:18 AM
To: 'Transfer TF (E-mail)'
Subject: [nc-transfer] Latest IRDX Draft and Status Update


Folks,

Please find attached the lastest draft of the IRDX document.

Note that the following items still require attention from the drafting
team;

1. Registry Constituency to provide comments re: enforcement model (and
alternatives if they continue to maintain that they should not be
involved in enforcing the provisions of their contract that this
proposal might alter)

2. Standardized definitions to be included.

3. Intellectual property disclaimers as per the last teleconference
still need to be included/clarified.

4. Inclusion of language concerning standardized forms of authorization
and apparent authority and attendant modifications as required.

If I do not receive further input on points 1, 3 and 4 by COB today, I
will be including language in a new draft that I will circulate and
(given the indulgence of our chair) discuss at this weeks conference
call in order that we can try and maintain some reasonable adherence to
our schedule.

Please do not hesitate to drop me a note if you have any questions or
clarifications.

                       -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog

Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal:
http://www.byte.org/heathrow