Re: [nc-udrp] subcommittees?

["J. Scott Evans" <jse@adamspat.com>]

Ethan:

Under the NC motion, new Chairs are to be selected after Caroline and Milton
distribute the surveys collected on the ICANN web site.

J. Scott Evans
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ethan Katsh" <katsh@legal.umass.edu>
To: <nc-udrp@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: [nc-udrp] subcommittees?


>          Is there any information as to when there will be new chairs?
>
> Ethan
>
> At 02:30 PM 3/7/02 -0500, you wrote:
> >The issue of subcommittees is best left to your new
> >chairs. In general, I would advise against them
> >but in view of my lame duck status my opinion can be
> >completely disregarded by the committee members.
> >
> >The reason I don't like them is that
> >1. there might not be a record of the communications,
> >2. anything a subcommittee decides will have to be
> >vetted through the full task force anyway
> >3. with asynchronous communication, is not easy
> >to keep track of the official status of proposals
> >or drafts that come out of subcommittees, and I
> >suspect people would become confused.
> >
> >However, we may at some point in the drafting
> >process agree to tell Task Force member X
> >to go off and write something by Y date so that
> >the group can throw darts at it collectively.
> >
> >And we might decide that instead of just telling
> >TF member X to do it, X should work with Z and Q
> >too, and if those three can come to an agreement
> >the TF as a whole might receive the proposal with
> >a more favorable presumption than otherwise.
> >
> >But until very specific tasks are to be assigned,
> >I would advise against any breakouts.
> >
> >"quack"/limp
> >--MM
> >
>
>