<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [nc-whois] Final (?): Accuracy
This looks good. I believe the following sentence fragment in item II can
be deleted because it is addressed in the final section on priorities:
We recommend this discussion be undertaken within the next :
Steve Metalitz
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler@does-not-exist.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 5:05 PM
To: nc-whois@dnso.org
Subject: [nc-whois] Final (?): Accuracy
Here's the accuracy chapter in HTML, including a variety of links.
I have taken the liberty to add a little headline to IC.
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|