ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-whois]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-whois] Final (?): Accuracy


I believe there was a consensus or at least a no objection to adding to
1C (?) an advise to ICANN to implement the 15 day period with leniency
in cases not clearly fraudulent and outside of the USA considering
time-frames of postal deliveries to such areas.

I would appreciate it if this was added.

Kind regards

Abel


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nc-whois@dnso.org [mailto:owner-nc-whois@dnso.org] On Behalf
Of Thomas Roessler
Sent: 27 November 2002 22:05
To: nc-whois@dnso.org
Subject: [nc-whois] Final (?): Accuracy


Here's the accuracy chapter in HTML, including a variety of links. I
have taken the liberty to add a little headline to IC.

-- 
Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>