<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign
I'm simply suggesting that we have a document with buy-in among registrars,
which would be a good draft from which to work.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ross Wm. Rader <ross@tucows.com>
To: Elana Broitman <ebroitman@register.com>; Erica Roberts
<erica.roberts@bigpond.com>; Amadeu Abril i Abril <Amadeu@nominalia.com>;
Robert F. Connelly <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:55 PM
Subject: RE: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign
> This was never ratified by the constituency as a voluntary best practices
> document. The last agreement we had as a group on this particular subject
> was pursuant to the drafting sessions that we had in LA. Post-LA, there
were
> no further discussions on the subject.
>
> -rwr
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > Behalf Of Elana Broitman
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:03 AM
> > To: Erica Roberts; Amadeu Abril i Abril; Robert F. Connelly
> > Cc: registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN -
> > Verisign
> >
> >
> > If you will recall, the registrars had agreed to a best practices
> > statement,
> > which addresses this issue, among others. It would help further
concensus
> > building to consider that draft for a starting position. Please
> > let me know
> > if you need a copy. Thanks, Elana
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Erica Roberts <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
> > To: Amadeu Abril i Abril <Amadeu@nominalia.com>; Robert F. Connelly
> > <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> > Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>
> > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 6:32 PM
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN -
Verisign
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm happy to progress this further - and maybe get it included in the
NC
> > > business plan.
> > > Amadeau - Do you still have the text you drafted when you were
> > a member of
> > > the NC?
> > >
> > > erica
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Amadeu Abril i Abril" <Amadeu@nominalia.com>
> > > To: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> > > Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:28 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN
> > - Verisign
> > >
> > >
> > > > "Robert F. Connelly" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > At 09:52 AM 4/2/01 -0400, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >There are no ICANN policies concerning warehousing.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Well, my very last task as NC rep was to start a resolution on
> > > > concrete language to implement the anti-warehousing language
provided
> > > > for in the ICANN Accreditation Agreement... but was then "sent" to
the
> > > > Board and I am afraid that NC never pursued that work.....
> > > >
> > > > Hope something could be done here ;-))
> > > >
> > > > Amadeu
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|