RE: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

This was never ratified by the constituency as a voluntary best practices
document. The last agreement we had as a group on this particular subject
was pursuant to the drafting sessions that we had in LA. Post-LA, there were
no further discussions on the subject.

-rwr

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Elana Broitman
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:03 AM
> To: Erica Roberts; Amadeu Abril i Abril; Robert F. Connelly
> Cc: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN -
> Verisign
>
>
> If you will recall, the registrars had agreed to a best practices
> statement,
> which addresses this issue, among others.  It would help further concensus
> building to consider that draft for a starting position.  Please
> let me know
> if you need a copy. Thanks, Elana
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Erica Roberts <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
> To: Amadeu Abril i Abril <Amadeu@nominalia.com>; Robert F. Connelly
> <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 6:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign
>
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm happy to progress this further - and maybe get it included in the NC
> > business plan.
> > Amadeau - Do you still have the text you drafted when you were
> a member of
> > the NC?
> >
> > erica
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Amadeu Abril i Abril" <Amadeu@nominalia.com>
> > To: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> > Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:28 AM
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN
> - Verisign
> >
> >
> > > "Robert F. Connelly" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > At 09:52 AM 4/2/01 -0400, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >There are no ICANN policies concerning warehousing.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well, my very last task as NC rep was to start a resolution on
> > > concrete language to implement the anti-warehousing language provided
> > > for in the ICANN Accreditation Agreement... but was then "sent" to the
> > > Board and I am afraid that NC never pursued that work.....
> > >
> > > Hope something could be done here ;-))
> > >
> > > Amadeu
> >
> >
>