Re: [registrars] Teleconference

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>]

why not make it 1 1/2 hours earlier.. to me that is more equitable for all
.. (it puts a small burden on california but not a severe one)

comments please ...

ken stubbs


----- Original Message -----
From: "erica" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
To: <Bryan.Evans@AllegianceTelecom.com>; "Michael D. Palage"
<michael@palage.com>; <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: [registrars] Teleconference


> This timing is not good for Australia - I suggest we make it one hour
> earlier - while this is still not good for au, it  is better!
>
> erica
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bryan Evans" <bevans@interaccess.com>
> To: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>; <registrars@dnso.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 3:13 AM
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Teleconference
>
>
> > Elana, Mike, and everyone,
> >
> > InterAccess/Allegiance Telecom would be happy to host a teleconference
> > on Monday morning.  I believe that the best time during the summer
> > for a teleconference is 14:00 GMT (10:00 AM New York, 9:00 AM Chicago,
> > 3:00 PM London, and 11:00 PM Tokyo).  If the constituency agrees, I
> > will set up a conference call for that time.
> >
> > I agree that a teleconference is necessary to determine the appropriate
> > constituency position on the transfer issue.  This situation affects
> > all of us, and any action (or even lack thereof) could have a long-
> > lasting effect on each of our businesses.
> >
> > -Bryan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > > Behalf Of Michael D. Palage
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 1:17 PM
> > > To: registrars@dnso.org
> > > Subject: [registrars] Teleconference
> > >
> > >
> > > I propose a teleconference for Monday morning to discuss the
> > > constituency's
> > > response to VeriSign's letter.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On

> > > > Behalf Of Elana Broitman
> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 1:50 PM
> > > > To: Michael D. Palage; registrars@dnso.org
> > > > Subject: RE: [registrars] VeriSign Letter to ICANN on XFER
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike - a number of weeks ago, I posted a message to the registrar
> > > > constituency list expressing register.com's intent to change
> > > the registrar
> > > > transfer policy.  However, as stated in that message, we hesitate to
> > > > institute a change until there is registrar concensus.  As we
> > > have always
> > > > believed, a change in policy must carefully balance consumer
> > > > protection and
> > > > registrar business practices, and we do not want to make any
> > > changes until
> > > > we know that there is concensus.
> > > >
> > > > Therefore, we would encourage you to schedule a registrar
> > > > constituency phone
> > > > call to gather comments on the registrar transfer policy and
> > > finalize the
> > > > concensus on this issue.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you and best regards, Elana
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > > > Behalf Of Michael D. Palage
> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 1:23 PM
> > > > To: registrars@dnso.org
> > > > Subject: [registrars] VeriSign Letter to ICANN on XFER
> > > > Importance: High
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Any comments on the letter Roger Cochetti sent to Stuart Lynn
> > > > with regard to
> > > > the transfer issue?
> > > >
> > > > http://www.icann.org/correspondence/cochetti-to-lynn-16jul01.htm
> > > >
> > > > Bruce maybe I missed this in my inbox, but it would be helpful if
your
> > > > company could have provided a courtesy copy to the registrar list.
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
>