Re: [registrars] Clarification

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

Michael,

Today has seen additional discussion on several outstanding substantive
items resulting in agreement on several previously unresolved points. This
has permitted the drafting committee to present a unified document that
obsoletes both Option A and Option B that were tabled by yourself earlier
today. This unified document is attached.

We request that, even though this document has been finalized after the
deadline determined by the Executive Committee, this document replace all
prior proposals on the subject (Option A and Option B). We also request that
the Constituency vote on the acceptance of this sole document rather than
deciding which of the two prior documents has superior merit.

On behalf of the drafting team, thank you again for your patience and
assistance through this effort.

-rwr


----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>
To: <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:22 AM
Subject: [registrars] Clarification


> Dear Registrars:
>
> This morning I posted what I believe was a final compromise document on
the
> transfer issue between the drafters. However, I have been informed by one
of
> the parties that there were material changes that are unacceptable.
>
> In my discussion with the Registrar Executive Committee yesterday that any
> further delay in producing this document was unacceptable. What we will
> therefore do is post each sides' final document. I will label each
Document
> A and Document B. Each will be made available for comment, and then voting
> will begin next week on which document properly reflects the
constituency's
> position.
>
> Mike
>

rc-irdx-091801-v1r0d8.doc