Re: [registrars] Consensus Building

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

I would agree with that point Erica. It is also important that we don't lose
sight of the fact that we are ICANN. Work doesn't need to get to the NC or
the Board before ICANN officially gets involved.

-rwr

----- Original Message -----
From: "Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
To: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>; "Registrar Constituency"
<registrars@dnso.org>; "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [registrars] Consensus Building


> I have no problems with this - but my point was that it was - and is - up
to
> the RC to move this matter forward.  We cannot accuse ICANN of 'lack of
> follow up'.
>
> erica
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
> To: "erica" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>; "Registrar Constituency"
> <registrars@dnso.org>; "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 10:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Consensus Building
>
>
> > It as never meant to go to the NC or the rest of the DNSO. It was,
> according
> > to my recollection, to be voted on by the RC as a voluntary best
practices
> > document.
> >
> > -rwr
> >
> >
> >
> > Tucows Inc.
> > t. 416.538.5492
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "erica" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
> > To: "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@dnso.org>; "Robert F. Connelly"
> > <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:58 PM
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] Consensus Building
> >
> >
> > > Hi Bob,
> > > I think we share a sense of frustration here.  But we can't blame
> ICANN -
> > it
> > > is up to the RC to put a proposal to the NC so that a DNSO position
can
> be
> > > developed.  So far, the RC has not referred the draft CoC to the NC so
> the
> > > DNSO has not been able to develop a position on the issue.
> > >
> > > erica
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> > > To: "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@dnso.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 5:58 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [registrars] Consensus Building
> > >
> > >
> > > > At 07:12 PM 9/27/01 +0800, erica wrote:
> > > > >It is perhaps worth reflecting that this may not have happened if
the
> > RC
> > > had
> > > > >forwarded the draft CoC to the NC for discussion and comment by
other
> > > > >constituencies.  It is not too late to do this and thus to progress
> the
> > > > >issue.
> > > > >
> > > > >erica
> > > >
> > > > Dear Erica:  I've mentioned it several times.  The Escrow system is
> > > another
> > > > example of the lack of follow up by ICANN.
> > > >
> > > > Regards, BobC
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>