Re: [registrars] Consensus Building

["Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>]

I have no problems with this - but my point was that it was - and is - up to
the RC to move this matter forward.  We cannot accuse ICANN of 'lack of
follow up'.

erica
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
To: "erica" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>; "Registrar Constituency"
<registrars@dnso.org>; "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: [registrars] Consensus Building


> It as never meant to go to the NC or the rest of the DNSO. It was,
according
> to my recollection, to be voted on by the RC as a voluntary best practices
> document.
>
> -rwr
>
>
>
> Tucows Inc.
> t. 416.538.5492
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "erica" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
> To: "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@dnso.org>; "Robert F. Connelly"
> <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Consensus Building
>
>
> > Hi Bob,
> > I think we share a sense of frustration here.  But we can't blame
ICANN -
> it
> > is up to the RC to put a proposal to the NC so that a DNSO position can
be
> > developed.  So far, the RC has not referred the draft CoC to the NC so
the
> > DNSO has not been able to develop a position on the issue.
> >
> > erica
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> > To: "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@dnso.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 5:58 PM
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] Consensus Building
> >
> >
> > > At 07:12 PM 9/27/01 +0800, erica wrote:
> > > >It is perhaps worth reflecting that this may not have happened if the
> RC
> > had
> > > >forwarded the draft CoC to the NC for discussion and comment by other
> > > >constituencies.  It is not too late to do this and thus to progress
the
> > > >issue.
> > > >
> > > >erica
> > >
> > > Dear Erica:  I've mentioned it several times.  The Escrow system is
> > another
> > > example of the lack of follow up by ICANN.
> > >
> > > Regards, BobC
> > >
> > >
> >
>