RE: [registrars] next step

["Siegfried Langenbach" <svl@nrw.net>]

Hallo,

 but that are all question that can be solved by ourself...
or we leave it for Veri$ign to solve it for us and pay for it.

siegfried

On 6 Jan 2002 at 18:39, Bhavin Turakhia wrote:

> > and BTW the system could include the other TLD, not only com - net.
> >
> > all together its an alternative. You know and I know that all the
> > emails protesting against Veri$ign are usless and a waste of time.
> > (makes you feel good because you protestet, that's all)
> >
> > The only reality is to do something, not (only) to discuss.
> 
> We ourselves have considered the entire possibility that you highlighted -
> for two simple reasons
> 
> 1. We somehow dont share the Verisign opinion that to build the WLS is
> complex or requires any huge investment. To the contrary we can have a 2 man
> team deploy a robust solution in less than a month
> 
> 2. Human Resources are far cheaper in India than in the US, and therefore we
> could match the cost for developing this system against ANYONE ELSE.
> 
> the only issue is this works fine until the domain is registered thru you.
> if the domain is registered thru some other registrar then it becomes
> complex even if a mutual solution is worked out. for instance -
> 
> * say a neutral entity (say a registrar cartale) develops the WLS System.
> Lets call this entity WLS
> 
> * Registrar A registers abc.com for Client (1)
> 
> * Registrar B has Client (2) who wants abc.com on expiry
> 
> * Registrar B notifies WLS that he wants abc.com on expiry
> 
> Now the question is who keeps the domain name after expiry. Does A keep the
> domain but change the owner as per the WLS subscription in the WLS cartale?
> Or does A have to trfer the domain name to B.
> 
> The former is quite easy to implement, however the latter is next to
> impossible with multiple registrars. To execute a transfer between two
> registrars using a neutral third party is impossible.
> 
>