RE: [registrars] next step

["Siegfried Langenbach" <svl@nrw.net>]

Hallo,

I certainly could...but that is not the real problem.

The real problem is that most people prefer to work AGAINST sombody,
for example Veri$ign, obviously without success (its just a kind of 
sport), instead to work FOR something, for example on own project.

So the 1st question would be :
who is prepared to join such an Veri$ign independent WLS ?

siegfried


On 7 Jan 2002 at 22:07, Bhavin Turakhia wrote:

> can u propose a solution to the problem.
> 
> how would you transgfer the domain between the registrars....
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > Behalf Of Siegfried Langenbach
> > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:47 PM
> > To: registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: RE: [registrars] next step
> > 
> > 
> > Hallo,
> > 
> >  but that are all question that can be solved by ourself...
> > or we leave it for Veri$ign to solve it for us and pay for it.
> > 
> > siegfried
> > 
> > On 6 Jan 2002 at 18:39, Bhavin Turakhia wrote:
> > 
> > > > and BTW the system could include the other TLD, not only com - net.
> > > >
> > > > all together its an alternative. You know and I know that all the
> > > > emails protesting against Veri$ign are usless and a waste of time.
> > > > (makes you feel good because you protestet, that's all)
> > > >
> > > > The only reality is to do something, not (only) to discuss.
> > > 
> > > We ourselves have considered the entire possibility that you 
> > highlighted -
> > > for two simple reasons
> > > 
> > > 1. We somehow dont share the Verisign opinion that to build the WLS is
> > > complex or requires any huge investment. To the contrary we can 
> > have a 2 man
> > > team deploy a robust solution in less than a month
> > > 
> > > 2. Human Resources are far cheaper in India than in the US, and 
> > therefore we
> > > could match the cost for developing this system against ANYONE ELSE.
> > > 
> > > the only issue is this works fine until the domain is 
> > registered thru you.
> > > if the domain is registered thru some other registrar then it becomes
> > > complex even if a mutual solution is worked out. for instance -
> > > 
> > > * say a neutral entity (say a registrar cartale) develops the 
> > WLS System.
> > > Lets call this entity WLS
> > > 
> > > * Registrar A registers abc.com for Client (1)
> > > 
> > > * Registrar B has Client (2) who wants abc.com on expiry
> > > 
> > > * Registrar B notifies WLS that he wants abc.com on expiry
> > > 
> > > Now the question is who keeps the domain name after expiry. 
> > Does A keep the
> > > domain but change the owner as per the WLS subscription in the 
> > WLS cartale?
> > > Or does A have to trfer the domain name to B.
> > > 
> > > The former is quite easy to implement, however the latter is next to
> > > impossible with multiple registrars. To execute a transfer between two
> > > registrars using a neutral third party is impossible.
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>