Re: [registrars] WHOIS BLUES

[Mike Lampson <lampson@iaregistry.com>]

BTW, the RAA allows the subcontracting of the Whois service ...

Regards,

Mike Lampson
The Registry at Info Avenue, LLC


----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Allan" <sallan@opensrs.org>
To: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@directi.com>; "RegistrarsDnso Org"
<registrars@dnso.org>
Cc: "Dan Halloran" <halloran@icann.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [registrars] WHOIS BLUES


We just blocked these guys as well. WRT your margins, perhaps you should
charge more... :)

sA

At 12:37 AM 5/2/02 +0530, Bhavin Turakhia wrote:
>Hi,
>
>i am going thru whois blues that most of you must have gone thru already. i
>get more hits on my whois everyday than my entire list of domain names ....
>for instance there is this guy right now slamming my whois server using
>multiple ip addresses from the same damn subnet ... as the log below
>shows....
>
>[01 May 2002 19:09:05,463] DEBUG WhoisServer  -++Added New Client
>65.218.40.188/65.218.40.188 Hash {65.218.40.188/65.218.40.188=1}
>[01 May 2002 19:09:16,048] DEBUG WhoisServer  -++Added New Client
>65.218.40.189/65.218.40.189 Hash {65.218.40.188/65.218.40.188=1,
>207.174.230.245/207.174.230.245=1, 65.218.40.189/65.218.40.189=1}
>[01 May 2002 19:09:26,847] DEBUG WhoisServer  -++Added New Client
>65.218.40.190/65.218.40.190 Hash {213.225.132.39/213.225.132.39=1,
>65.218.40.190/65.218.40.190=1}
>[01 May 2002 19:09:35,467] DEBUG WhoisServer  -++Added New Client
>65.218.40.191/65.218.40.191 Hash {65.218.40.191/65.218.40.191=1}
>[01 May 2002 19:09:45,479] DEBUG WhoisServer  -++Added New Client
>65.218.40.192/65.218.40.192 Hash {65.218.40.192/65.218.40.192=1}
>[01 May 2002 19:10:03,610] DEBUG WhoisServer  -++Added New Client
>65.218.40.193/65.218.40.193 Hash {65.218.40.193/65.218.40.193=1,
>golem.itsyourdomain.com/63.85.86.40=1}
>[01 May 2002 19:10:08,909] DEBUG WhoisServer  -++Added New Client
>65.218.40.194/65.218.40.194 Hash {65.218.40.194/65.218.40.194=1,
>65.218.40.193/65.218.40.193=1}
>[01 May 2002 19:10:15,510] DEBUG WhoisServer  -++Added New Client
>65.218.40.195/65.218.40.195 Hash {65.218.40.195/65.218.40.195=1,
>65.218.40.194/65.218.40.194=1}
>[01 May 2002 19:10:25,519] DEBUG WhoisServer  -++Added New Client
>65.218.40.196/65.218.40.196 Hash {65.218.40.196/65.218.40.196=1}
>[01 May 2002 19:10:36,040] DEBUG WhoisServer  -++Added New Client
>65.218.40.197/65.218.40.197 Hash {65.218.40.197/65.218.40.197=1,
>216.168.229.6/216.168.229.6=1}
>[01 May 2002 19:10:54,460] DEBUG WhoisServer  -++Added New Client
>65.218.40.198/65.218.40.198 Hash {65.218.40.198/65.218.40.198=1,
>droid.daze.net/130.94.96.2=1}
>
>
>This process becomes more and more manual - we put in a feature to block an
>ip and here comes a subnet .... subnets we have to handle manually -
unlessi
>write some stuff to track complex patterns (wonder how i would take CIDR
>into account to identify subnets)
>
>If i get whois requests for all my domains several times everyday in this
>fashion my margins wont support my whois server bandwidth costs :)
>
>something should be done by icanb about this port 43 whois requirement
>...... maybe require eveyone who wants to use it to ask the registrar for
an
>account (username and passwd) so that abuse can be tracked and stopped ....
>
>bhavin

Scott Allan
Director OpenSRS
sallan@opensrs.org