RE: [registrars] RE: Votebot

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

I think at this point that the document is extremely close to what the
NC will be receiving. My preference would be to hold the vote now, see
what the changes are, present them back to the RC and then depending on
the feedback, provide the NC reps with final directions (based on the
vote and comments made pursuant to any changes early next week.).

The great thing about chickens and eggs is that they both make for
delicious meals. The challenge lies in picking the best way to cook them
;)



                       -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal:
http://www.byte.org/heathrow
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Rob Hall
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:49 PM
> To: ross@tucows.com; 'Bruce Tonkin'; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Votebot
> 
> 
> Ross,
> 
> Does that mean the document could change depending on the 
> vote of the task force ?  Should we be waiting to see the 
> outcome of that vote prior to the RC deciding its opinion ?
> 
> I know this is a classic chicken and the egg scenario ... 
> perhaps we should vote on what it is now, and then vote again 
> if it changes should the task force not approve it and go 
> with something else.
> 
> Rob.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 7:50 AM
> To: 'Bruce Tonkin'; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Votebot
> 
> 
> > The approach Ross suggests above would be most helpful to the Task 
> > Force reps as well as the Names Council reps.  We can provide 
> > targetted feedback. For example some points might get more than 80% 
> > support, while others may be around the 60% mark.
> 
> Indeed. I've just discovered this morning that the TF will 
> actually be voting on the final document before it goes to 
> the NC for review. While I was comfortable with the mandate I 
> received prior to the last ICANN meeting, I'm not sure what 
> the general sentiment is anymore (based on a few 
> conversations, this list and of course, the recent straw 
> poll). I'd love to be able to get this vote out of the way 
> prior to the Tuesday TF call in order that I can 
> appropriately represent the constituency view - whatever that 
> may be at this point.
> 
> -rwr
> 
>