Re: [registrars] RE: Votebot

[Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@digitel.net>]

agree 100% please start the vote ASAP..

it would be best if  we can start tomorrow sometime  and end tues july 23 @
24:00 GMT with results available  within 4 hours of closing ..( that would
be approx. 9 pm pacific time..)

the Names council meeting is scheduled for  wed july 24 at 15:00 CET (thats
06:00 pacific daylight time)


ken stubbs




----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
To: "'Rob Hall'" <rob@momentous.ca>; "'Bruce Tonkin'"
<Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>; <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 13:11 PM
Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Votebot


> I think at this point that the document is extremely close to what the
> NC will be receiving. My preference would be to hold the vote now, see
> what the changes are, present them back to the RC and then depending on
> the feedback, provide the NC reps with final directions (based on the
> vote and comments made pursuant to any changes early next week.).
>
> The great thing about chickens and eggs is that they both make for
> delicious meals. The challenge lies in picking the best way to cook them
> ;)
>
>
>
>                        -rwr
>
>
>
>
> "There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
> idiot."
> - Steven Wright
>
> Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal:
> http://www.byte.org/heathrow
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org
> > [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Rob Hall
> > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:49 PM
> > To: ross@tucows.com; 'Bruce Tonkin'; registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Votebot
> >
> >
> > Ross,
> >
> > Does that mean the document could change depending on the
> > vote of the task force ?  Should we be waiting to see the
> > outcome of that vote prior to the RC deciding its opinion ?
> >
> > I know this is a classic chicken and the egg scenario ...
> > perhaps we should vote on what it is now, and then vote again
> > if it changes should the task force not approve it and go
> > with something else.
> >
> > Rob.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
> > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 7:50 AM
> > To: 'Bruce Tonkin'; registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Votebot
> >
> >
> > > The approach Ross suggests above would be most helpful to the Task
> > > Force reps as well as the Names Council reps.  We can provide
> > > targetted feedback. For example some points might get more than 80%
> > > support, while others may be around the 60% mark.
> >
> > Indeed. I've just discovered this morning that the TF will
> > actually be voting on the final document before it goes to
> > the NC for review. While I was comfortable with the mandate I
> > received prior to the last ICANN meeting, I'm not sure what
> > the general sentiment is anymore (based on a few
> > conversations, this list and of course, the recent straw
> > poll). I'd love to be able to get this vote out of the way
> > prior to the Tuesday TF call in order that I can
> > appropriately represent the constituency view - whatever that
> > may be at this point.
> >
> > -rwr
> >
> >
>
>