RE: [registrars] WLS - VOTING - Objection

[dwascher@iaregistry.com]

This part of the conversation is mute. VeriSign will be dictating what data
we will be needing and showing. This is a VeriSign service not a RC service.
Nothing has been said that I have to collect anything other then money and
someway to get back to the customer if the name is given to them. At the
time of the WLS their is no registrant nor UDRP contract.

Some of these objections should be asking about the implementation if we are
going to vote "YES or NO"

David Wascher

**-----Original Message-----
**From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
**Behalf Of Rick Wesson
**Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 3:39 PM
**To: Rob Hall
**Cc: Tim Ruiz; registrars@dnso.org
**Subject: RE: [registrars] WLS - VOTING - Objection
**
**
**
**Rob,
**
**On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Rob Hall wrote:
**
**[snip]
**
**on publishing WLS registrant data...
**
**> But I don't want to go to far down the legal argument here.
**That is best
**> left for others (ie: lawyers!).  I can see no advantage in
**giving out the
**> information publically, other than to allow current Registrants to get
**> upset.
**
**what do you think the public and the press are going to say about all this
**when it hits the fan? we could have made it available but we didn't want
**folks to panic? now thats keeping the DNS stable... not.
**
**If registrants are going to get upset about a WLS on their domain then we
**need to make sure we are as open and transparent as possable or this
**industry will pay the price.
**
**-rick
**
**