DNSO Archives: [registrars]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] WLS - VOTING - Objection

To: Jim Archer <jarcher@registrationtek.com>
Subject: RE: [registrars] WLS - VOTING - Objection
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:18:42 -0700
Cc: tim@godaddy.com, registrars@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <1657763.1027357439@[192.168.1.105]>
References: <BGEGKKJCFEMGKMJFGFHMMEKCPAAA.tim@godaddy.com><BGEGKKJCFEMGKMJFGFHMMEKCPAAA.tim@godaddy.com>
Sender: owner-registrars@dnso.org

At 05:03 PM 7/22/02 -0400, Jim Archer wrote:

I think in most cases, the domain holder would end up paying off the WLS older [sic: Do you mean "order"], if they can.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [registrars] WLS - VOTING - Objection
  - From: Jim Archer <jarcher@registrationtek.com>

References:
- RE: [registrars] WLS - VOTING - Objection
  - From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>
- RE: [registrars] WLS - VOTING - Objection
  - From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>
- RE: [registrars] WLS - VOTING - Objection
  - From: Jim Archer <jarcher@registrationtek.com>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>