RE: [registrars] WLS - VOTING - Objection

[Jim Archer <jarcher@registrationtek.com>]

Actually, I meant "domain holder".

Sorry for the typo error.  Thanks for giving me a chance to clarify.

Jim

--On Monday, July 22, 2002 2:18 PM -0700 "Robert F. Connelly" 
<rconnell@psi-japan.com> wrote:

> At 05:03 PM 7/22/02 -0400, Jim Archer wrote:
>
>  I think in most cases, the domain holder would end up paying off the WLS
> older [sic: Do you mean "order"], if they can.
>