Re: [registrars] FW: [nc-transfer] Drafting Team Status Update

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

> >What about the case where a determined hijacker repeatedly puts in
> >transfer requests for a domain name?  The registrant would be expected to
> >affirm repeatedly that they disapprove each transfer.
>
> Or put it on lock;-)  Regards, BobC

Or it gets caught by the manual review and/or black-list.

Or more importantly, the administrative contact/registrant *never* approves
the request for authorization and the process goes nowhere. Don't forget
that the authorizations received by the GR must be explicit so the situation
that you are describing and that others are supporting would never happen.



                     -rwr




Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog

"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of
thought which they seldom use."
 - Soren Kierkegaard



----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
To: "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: [nc-transfer] Drafting Team Status Update


> At 04:59 AM 9/2/02 -0400, Michael Bilow wrote:
> >What about the case where a determined hijacker repeatedly puts in
> >transfer requests for a domain name?  The registrant would be expected to
> >affirm repeatedly that they disapprove each transfer.
>
> Or put it on lock;-)  Regards, BobC
>
>
>