Re: [registrars] FW: [nc-transfer] Drafting Team Status Update
Would never happen? C'mon, let's get realistic. You're asking me to count on the fact that a competitor has done their job, and that they will cooperate if they haven't? The fact remains that the losing registrar is best judge of apparent authority, has an existing contractual obligation to the registrant, and should not be (and I would argue cannot be) required to ACK a transfer without verifying it with the registrant in a manner they deem appropriate. Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [registrars] FW: [nc-transfer] Drafting Team Status Update From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com> Date: Mon, September 2, 2002 8:22 am To: "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@dnso.org> > >What about the case where a determined hijacker repeatedly puts in > >transfer requests for a domain name? The registrant would be > >expected to affirm repeatedly that they disapprove each transfer. > > Or put it on lock;-) Regards, BobC Or it gets caught by the manual review and/or black-list. Or more importantly, the administrative contact/registrant *never* approves the request for authorization and the process goes nowhere. Don't forget that the authorizations received by the GR must be explicit so the situation that you are describing and that others are supporting would never happen. -rwr Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog "People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." - Soren Kierkegaard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com> To: "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@dnso.org> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 10:04 AM Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: [nc-transfer] Drafting Team Status Update > At 04:59 AM 9/2/02 -0400, Michael Bilow wrote: > >What about the case where a determined hijacker repeatedly puts in > >transfer requests for a domain name? The registrant would be > >expected to affirm repeatedly that they disapprove each transfer. > > Or put it on lock;-) Regards, BobC
|