ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Re: Registrars Collecting on Multi-YearRegistrations


I think a 60 day window is not enough, there should be at least a 120 day
period.
In any case the registries should give refunds in fraud cases involving
multiyear registrations.
It is just a matter of not charging registrars for "non rendered" services,
as in any other industry.

JP

> From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>
> Reply-To: <tim@godaddy.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 13:26:53 -0500
> To: <registrars@dnso.org>
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Re: Registrars Collecting on Multi-Year
> Registrations
> 
> What would think about the registries giving us 5 days to cancel with full
> refund as they do now, but add a 30-60 day window in which we could cancel
> and receive a refund less 1 year?
> 
> Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Bhavin Turakhia
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:05 PM
> To: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Re: Registrars Collecting on Multi-Year
> Registrations
> 
> 
>> We need all remember that we are currently pushing the
>> Verisign registry to change the auto-renew policy to an
>> auto-delete/explicit renew which would free up significant
>> dollars for all of us that currently gets tied up in
>> maintaining an unnecessarily high float with the registry.
> 
> The discussion here was however with respect tio verisign registry not
> making it easier for registrars to reduce theirt losses incase of
> fraudulent transactions on multi-year domain registrations.
> 
> If a domain is deleted and it has 10 years we should atleast be refunded
> for 9 years.
> 
> Offcourse there is the addtl tweak of reducing costing on multi year
> registrations since they would make money on the interest float anyways.
> However the fraud concern is a higher concern
> 
> bhavin
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>