RE: [registrars] RE: ICANN Shanghai Meeting Topic Transfers of gTLD Domain Names 28-31 October 200

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>]

I meant to reply only to Ross and Michael but hit Reply to All out of habit.
I don't mean to start another round of emails debating the particulars here
on the list. I only meant to support Elana's view that it would be an
appropriate topic for the RC meeting prior to any presentation.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@godaddy.com]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 5:31 PM
To: Ross Wm. Rader; Elana Broitman; 'Michael D. Palage';
registrars@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: ICANN Shanghai Meeting Topic Transfers of
gTLD Domain Names 28-31 October 200


Ross,

Maybe I've been reading a different mail list. I recall BulkRegister,
joker.com, 007names, Namescout.com, and of course Go Daddy all voicing what
sounded like disagreement and/or concerns with various parts of the
proposal. Perhaps I misunderstood their comments, but it looks like more
than two registrars to me.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:38 PM
To: Elana Broitman; 'Michael D. Palage'; registrars@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: ICANN Shanghai Meeting Topic Transfers of
gTLD Domain Names 28-31 October 200


>...it's always been a contentious issue, and continues to
> have a number of diff. proposals and different registrar positions, it is
> worth a place on the agenda the day before you make a public presentation.


I would strongly beg to differ with your characterization. The constituency
position has been loudly opposed by two specific registrars since day one.
Oddly, it is anything but a contentious issue. It has also been on the
agenda of every single registrar meeting going back almost two years and the
constituency position hasn't changed much. While it does deserve a spot on
the agenda for Shanghai, I doubt that we will be discussing anything new -
we are dealing with well-trod ground.

If anyone does want to get up to speed on what the TF has been up to for the
last 18 months, please feel free to give me a ring at the office.

Thanks,


                     -rwr




Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog

"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of
thought which they seldom use."
 - Soren Kierkegaard



----- Original Message -----
From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>
To: "'Michael D. Palage'" <michael@palage.com>; <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:20 PM
Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: ICANN Shanghai Meeting Topic Transfers of gTLD
Domain Names 28-31 October 200


> Great to hear - since it's always been a contentious issue, and continues
to
> have a number of diff. proposals and different registrar positions, it is
> worth a place on the agenda the day before you make a public presentation.
>
> Thanks, Elana
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael D. Palage [mailto:michael@palage.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:14 PM
> To: Elana Broitman; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: [registrars] RE: ICANN Shanghai Meeting Topic Transfers of gTLD
> Domain Names 28-31 October 200
>
>
> It has been a topic of conversation for over 18 months and will continue
to
> be so until it is resolved.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elana Broitman [mailto:ebroitman@register.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:52 PM
> To: 'Michael D. Palage'; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: ICANN Shanghai Meeting Topic Transfers of gTLD Domain Names
> 28-31 October 200
>
>
> Given that the constituency will be asked for a view on Tuesday at the
ICANN
> meeting, I hope that this issue is placed on the constituency's Monday
> agenda.  Thanks, Elana
>  <<ICANN  Shanghai Meeting Topic Transfers of gTLD Domain Names  28-31
> October 2002.htm>>