Re: [registrars] RE: ICANN Shanghai Meeting Topic Transfers of gTLD Domain Names 28-31 October 200

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

> Maybe I've been reading a different mail list. I recall BulkRegister,
> joker.com, 007names, Namescout.com, and of course Go Daddy all voicing
what
> sounded like disagreement and/or concerns with various parts of the
> proposal. Perhaps I misunderstood their comments, but it looks like more
> than two registrars to me.


The concerns, comments and suggestions that Siegfried, yourself, Paul and
Rob have brought forward (amongst others) is called constructive criticism -
it has made the constituency position stronger.

This stands in stark contrast to the obstinate opposition of those
registrars who have refused to cooperate towards a compromise and will most
certainly reserve their "participation" for the public comment period. This
is disappointing, but expected.

But it doesn't make it contentious, and it certainly doesn't mean that the
constituency is being surprised by the ExComm as it relates to the Shanghai
agenda.


                     -rwr




Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog

"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of
thought which they seldom use."
 - Soren Kierkegaard



----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>
To: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>; "Elana Broitman"
<ebroitman@register.com>; "'Michael D. Palage'" <michael@palage.com>;
<registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 6:30 PM
Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: ICANN Shanghai Meeting Topic Transfers of gTLD
Domain Names 28-31 October 200


> Ross,
>
> Maybe I've been reading a different mail list. I recall BulkRegister,
> joker.com, 007names, Namescout.com, and of course Go Daddy all voicing
what
> sounded like disagreement and/or concerns with various parts of the
> proposal. Perhaps I misunderstood their comments, but it looks like more
> than two registrars to me.
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:38 PM
> To: Elana Broitman; 'Michael D. Palage'; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: ICANN Shanghai Meeting Topic Transfers of
> gTLD Domain Names 28-31 October 200
>
>
> >...it's always been a contentious issue, and continues to
> > have a number of diff. proposals and different registrar positions, it
is
> > worth a place on the agenda the day before you make a public
presentation.
>
>
> I would strongly beg to differ with your characterization. The
constituency
> position has been loudly opposed by two specific registrars since day one.
> Oddly, it is anything but a contentious issue. It has also been on the
> agenda of every single registrar meeting going back almost two years and
the
> constituency position hasn't changed much. While it does deserve a spot on
> the agenda for Shanghai, I doubt that we will be discussing anything new -
> we are dealing with well-trod ground.
>
> If anyone does want to get up to speed on what the TF has been up to for
the
> last 18 months, please feel free to give me a ring at the office.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>                      -rwr
>
>
>
>
> Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog
>
> "People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of
> thought which they seldom use."
>  - Soren Kierkegaard
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>
> To: "'Michael D. Palage'" <michael@palage.com>; <registrars@dnso.org>
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:20 PM
> Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: ICANN Shanghai Meeting Topic Transfers of
gTLD
> Domain Names 28-31 October 200
>
>
> > Great to hear - since it's always been a contentious issue, and
continues
> to
> > have a number of diff. proposals and different registrar positions, it
is
> > worth a place on the agenda the day before you make a public
presentation.
> >
> > Thanks, Elana
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael D. Palage [mailto:michael@palage.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:14 PM
> > To: Elana Broitman; registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: [registrars] RE: ICANN Shanghai Meeting Topic Transfers of gTLD
> > Domain Names 28-31 October 200
> >
> >
> > It has been a topic of conversation for over 18 months and will continue
> to
> > be so until it is resolved.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Elana Broitman [mailto:ebroitman@register.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:52 PM
> > To: 'Michael D. Palage'; registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: ICANN Shanghai Meeting Topic Transfers of gTLD Domain Names
> > 28-31 October 200
> >
> >
> > Given that the constituency will be asked for a view on Tuesday at the
> ICANN
> > meeting, I hope that this issue is placed on the constituency's Monday
> > agenda.  Thanks, Elana
> >  <<ICANN  Shanghai Meeting Topic Transfers of gTLD Domain Names  28-31
> > October 2002.htm>>
>
>