RE: RE: [registrars] budget committee

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

> Rick has a good point, though.  I believe that the 
> Registrar's representatives to the Budget Committee were 
> fairly well distributed last year.  As an independant, fairly 
> unbiased person at this time, I would recommend that the 
> constituency select a broad mix, again (at least one rep from 
> large registrar, and one rep from a smaller registrar).
> 
> IMHO, it also worked well that one of the reps was also a 
> member of the Executive Committee.  It makes it easier when 
> coordinating constituency efforts.

I'd agree Bryan. Rick, Elana and Rob all fit the bill here (large,
small, excomm) and each certainly have my support to move us through
2003's budget efforts.


                       -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog

Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal:
http://www.byte.org/heathrow


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of bryan@interaccess.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 1:20 PM
> To: Rob Hall
> Cc: Rick Wesson; Elana Broitman; Registrars List
> Subject: Re: RE: [registrars] budget committee
> 
> 
> Elana, Rick, Rob, and others,
> 
> I represented a small registrar on the Budget Committee, as 
> well.  Although, Allegiance Telecom is a reasonably large 
> company, even if it's a tiny registrar, so that might not count.
> 
> Rick has a good point, though.  I believe that the 
> Registrar's representatives to the Budget Committee were 
> fairly well distributed last year.  As an independant, fairly 
> unbiased person at this time, I would recommend that the 
> constituency select a broad mix, again (at least one rep from 
> large registrar, and one rep from a smaller registrar).
> 
> IMHO, it also worked well that one of the reps was also a 
> member of the Executive Committee.  It makes it easier when 
> coordinating constituency efforts.
> 
> -Bryan
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Rob Hall <rob@momentous.com>
> Date: Thursday, December 5, 2002 11:50 am
> Subject: RE: [registrars] budget committee
> 
> > Rick,
> > 
> > I would guess that Elana is refering to me.  As you know, we are
> > not yet in
> > the top 10 Registrars, but we still do pay a fair amount of fees 
> > to ICANN.
> > 
> > Rob.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org 
> [owner-registrars@dnso.org]On Behalf 
> > Of Rick Wesson
> > Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:45 AM
> > To: Elana Broitman
> > Cc: Registrars List
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] budget committee
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Elana Broitman wrote:
> > 
> > > Dear Registrars - I would be honored to continue to represent the 
> > > constituency as one of the 3 registrar members of the 
> ICANN budget 
> > > committee.  I have diligently worked - together with my fellow
> > registrar> representatives - to represent the constituency's
> > interests, understand
> > the
> > > detalis of the ICANN budgeting process and budget proposals, and
> > ensurethat
> > > registrar interests have an opportunity to influence the ICANN
> > funding> process.
> > 
> > > We have had a good team representing small and large 
> registrars, and 
> > > I would recommend that the constituency maintain a
> > representation of
> > the
> > > various registrar business models.
> > 
> > 
> > Who is it that was represneting small registrars on the budget
> > committee.
> > thanks,
> > 
> > -rick
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>