<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: RE: [registrars] budget committee
Just for clarification, I thought of Bryan as the small one, Rob as medium,
and me as large (pretty funny considering my height)'-)
-----Original Message-----
From: bryan@interaccess.com [mailto:bryan@interaccess.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Rob Hall
Cc: wessorh@ar.com; Elana Broitman; Registrars List
Subject: Re: RE: [registrars] budget committee
Elana, Rick, Rob, and others,
I represented a small registrar on the Budget Committee, as well. Although,
Allegiance Telecom is a reasonably large company, even if it's a tiny
registrar, so that might not count.
Rick has a good point, though. I believe that the Registrar's
representatives to the Budget Committee were fairly well distributed last
year. As an independant, fairly unbiased person at this time, I would
recommend that the constituency select a broad mix, again (at least one rep
from large registrar, and one rep from a smaller registrar).
IMHO, it also worked well that one of the reps was also a member of the
Executive Committee. It makes it easier when coordinating constituency
efforts.
-Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: Rob Hall <rob@momentous.com>
Date: Thursday, December 5, 2002 11:50 am
Subject: RE: [registrars] budget committee
> Rick,
>
> I would guess that Elana is refering to me. As you know, we are
> not yet in
> the top 10 Registrars, but we still do pay a fair amount of fees
> to ICANN.
>
> Rob.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Rick Wesson
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:45 AM
> To: Elana Broitman
> Cc: Registrars List
> Subject: Re: [registrars] budget committee
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Elana Broitman wrote:
>
> > Dear Registrars - I would be honored to continue to represent the
> > constituency as one of the 3 registrar members of the ICANN budget
> > committee. I have diligently worked - together with my fellow
> registrar> representatives - to represent the constituency's
> interests, understand
> the
> > detalis of the ICANN budgeting process and budget proposals, and
> ensurethat
> > registrar interests have an opportunity to influence the ICANN
> funding> process.
>
> > We have had a good team representing small and large registrars,
> > and I would recommend that the constituency maintain a
> representation of
> the
> > various registrar business models.
>
>
> Who is it that was represneting small registrars on the budget
> committee.
> thanks,
>
> -rick
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|