<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Recovery during grace period.
This is definetly incorrect - there was NO TALK of sacrificing the 5 day
registry hold in lieu of the redemption grace period. The hold period
has to remain (RRP defines a delete grace period). I hope verisign can
provide some clarification here
bhavin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org
> [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of JP
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:53 PM
> To: Robert F. Connelly; Registrar Constituency
> Cc: Chuck Gomes
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Recovery during grace period.
>
>
>
> We are having the same problem.
>
> I remember almost everybody agreeing to the redemption
> period, in ADDITION to the 5 days. Did any Registrar agreed
> to give up the 5 days?
>
> JP
>
> > From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> > Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 07:52:21 -0800
> > To: Registrar Constituency <registrars@dnso.org>
> > Cc: Chuck Gomes <cgomes@verisign.com>
> > Subject: [registrars] Recovery during grace period.
> >
> > Dear Colleagues:
> >
> > We were surprised at one aspect of the implementation of the Delete
> > Redemption system.
> >
> > As you will remember, when a domain was deleted in the past, it was
> > placed on registry-hold for five days. I was expecting that the
> > redemption grace period would begin after the five days on
> > registry-hold.
> >
> > We had an inadvertent deletion on 2 February, I caught it within 8
> > hours. But it was already on the Redemption Grace status.
> Not only
> > is it costing us $85 now, but the system is flawed. We
> completed the
> > Redemption Report 24 hours ago but the domain is still in limbo. I
> > called Verisign just now and was promised an answer in 3 hours.
> >
> > Any other experiences with Redemption Grace?
> >
> > Regards, BobC
> >
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|