[registrars] WHOIS issues reports

["Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>]

Hello Tim,

Just to make clear the process.  The WHOIS task force is producing documents to decide whether to initiate policy action.  The documents are supposed to raise the issues, not solve the issues.

At the GNSO Council meeting at Rio, a decision will need to be made whether to initiate policy action.  This decision wil be based on whether the issue is important.  It will make no judgement on any policy suggestions put forward at this stage.   If the issues are important a new task force will be formed to look at solutions to that issue.  ie the same process used for the deletes task force.

Regards,
Bruce

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@godaddy.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 8 March 2003 1:36 AM
> To: 'Ken Stubbs'; 'Registrars'
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Fw: [nc-whois] DRAFT: policy options
> 
> 
> Hello Ken,
> 
> My initial concern, and you may already have caught this, is that the
> document is completely devoid of any discussion about the cost of
> implementing the various options discussed.
> 
> None of the options can be seriously considered without that piece.
> 
> Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On
> Behalf Of Ken Stubbs
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 7:55 AM
> To: Registrars
> Subject: [registrars] Fw: [nc-whois] DRAFT: policy options
> 
> FYI
> 
> please review this document and get back to me with your thoughts
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
> To: <nc-whois@dnso.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 7:25 AM
> Subject: [nc-whois] DRAFT: policy options
> 
> 
> > Please find attached a first (and naturally incomplete) draft for
> > the third part of the privacy issues report. I've tried to keep this
> > as high-level as possible, while still outlining major options and
> > giving some hints at what should be taken into account in any
> > discussion of these options.
> > 
> > I hope that this is useful as a starting point for our discussions
> > today, and for further drafting.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > -- 
> > Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
> > 
> 
>