Re: [registrars] WHOIS issues reports

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>]

Bruce,

Thanks for the clarification.

Tim
 -------- Original Message --------
   Subject: [registrars] WHOIS issues reports
   From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>
   Date: Fri, March 7, 2003 6:06 pm
   To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>, "Registrars" <Registrars@dnso.org>

   Hello Tim,

   Just to make clear the process.  The WHOIS task force is producing
   documents to decide whether to initiate policy action.  The documents
   are supposed to raise the issues, not solve the issues.

   At the GNSO Council meeting at Rio, a decision will need to be made
   whether to initiate policy action.  This decision wil be based on
   whether the issue is important.  It will make no judgement on any
   policy suggestions put forward at this stage.   If the issues are
   important a new task force will be formed to look at solutions to that
   issue.  ie the same process used for the deletes task force.

   Regards,
   Bruce

   > -----Original Message-----
   > From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@godaddy.com]
   > Sent: Saturday, 8 March 2003 1:36 AM
   > To: 'Ken Stubbs'; 'Registrars'
   > Subject: RE: [registrars] Fw: [nc-whois] DRAFT: policy options
   >
   >
   > Hello Ken,
   >
   > My initial concern, and you may already have caught this, is that
   > the document is completely devoid of any discussion about the cost
   > of implementing the various options discussed.
   >
   > None of the options can be seriously considered without that piece.
   >
   > Tim
   >
   > -----Original Message-----
   > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]
   > On Behalf Of Ken Stubbs
   > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 7:55 AM
   > To: Registrars
   > Subject: [registrars] Fw: [nc-whois] DRAFT: policy options
   >
   > FYI
   >
   > please review this document and get back to me with your thoughts
   >
   > ----- Original Message -----
   > From: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
   > To: <nc-whois@dnso.org>
   > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 7:25 AM
   > Subject: [nc-whois] DRAFT: policy options
   >
   >
   > > Please find attached a first (and naturally incomplete) draft for
   > > the third part of the privacy issues report. I've tried to keep
   > > this as high-level as possible, while still outlining major
   > > options and giving some hints at what should be taken into account
   > > in any
   > > discussion of these options.
   > >
   > > I hope that this is useful as a starting point for our discussions
   > > today, and for further drafting.
   > >
   > > Regards,
   > > --
   > > Thomas Roessler
   > > <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
   > >
   >
   >