RE: [registrars] Names Council Board Vote

[Nikolaj Nyholm <nikolajn@ascio.com>]

Ascio would like to support this view on how ballots are cast -- it indeed
would be representative democracy.

/n

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com] 
> Sent: 13. marts 2003 12:41
> To: registrars@dnso.org
> Cc: rc-excomm@ar.com
> Subject: [registrars] Names Council Board Vote
> 
> 
> Tucows would like to congratulate Mike for prevailing in 
> ballot #27. Our
> constituency has voted with clarity that will be useful in 
> guiding our Names
> Council representatives.
> 
> To further assist, we propose that given the clear duality in 
> the results of
> the ballot preferring both Mike and Alejandro that our Names Council
> representatives vote in a similar fashion. It is my 
> understanding that our
> constituency has 6 votes per ballot. It would seem reasonable 
> that 2/3's of
> these be cast in Mike's favor, 1/3 in Alejandro's, in each round of
> balloting until such time that either candidate is no longer 
> on the ballot,
> at which time all 6 votes would be cast for the remaining 
> candidate of the
> two.
> 
> 
>                      -rwr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Got Blog? http://www.byte.org
> 
> "People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of
> thought which they seldom use."
>  - Soren Kierkegaard
> 
> 
>