RE: [registrars] rio meeting agenda

["Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>]

Elana:

The registrars have the room for the entire day. I am scheduling to have it
set up in our preferred U configuration.

Marilyn has scheduled her joint meeting in the morning with the business,
ISP and IPC, although I believe it is open for anyone to attend.

Regarding the WIPO proposal, I can speak in great detail on this subject
matter as I have been working with Afilias in connection with ICANN Board
Resolution 01-92 regarding the .INFO country names. Additionally, I was at
the IPC meeting in NY a couple of weeks ago where this topic was discussed.
Finally, I have provided expert testimony in a federal litigation regarding
trademark protection of geographic marks.

Right now I am trying to finish up the tax power point presentation.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elana Broitman [mailto:ebroitman@register.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 3:34 PM
> To: kstubbs@digitel.net; Michael D. Palage
> Cc: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [registrars] rio meeting agenda
>
>
> i also understand that Marilyn may be scheduling a
> cross-constituency meeting.  If that's the case, no need to take
> time in Rio.  But if not, we should be informed, so that we can
> send comments by the deadline.
>
> What time is our meeting on Monday?
>
> On a separate matter, could we please go over the draft bylaws
> and voting procedures at the meeting?
>
> Thanks, Elana
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kstubbs@digitel.net
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:01 PM
> To: Elana Broitman; Michael D. Palage
> Cc: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [registrars] rio meeting agenda
>
>
> this proposal appears not to be getting any "legs" in the other
> constituancies so far..
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>
> To: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>
> Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:37 AM
> Subject: [registrars] rio meeting agenda
>
>
> > WIPO proposals to extend UDRP protection to international governmental
> organizations and country names should be discussed by the constituency as
> the ICANN board had remanded it to the the policy process.
> >
> > Thanks, Elana
> >
> >
>