RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

> per the rules we, ourselves, set out all unfriendly 
> amendments will need a vote

So do any motions that receive a second. Which leaves us with a bit of
an impasse that precisely proves my underlying point.

The #1 goal of this bylaw revision process was to ensure that we had a
proper set of processes by which we could do day to day things like
*debate* and *vote*. I don't believe that our mandate included changing
the basic constitution of the constituency.

Fairness would dictate that if it is possible for someone to put forward
an amendment that diminishes my voting rights, then it is equally fair
for me to put forward an amendment that restricts their voting rights.

My request to the ExecComm stands and failing that, I would note that I
have not withdrawn my motion on the grounds that it is "cute". Something
this serious requires the benefit of the more stringent voting
requirements set forth in the draft bylaws. Until they are in place, I
consider it highly inappropriate to undertake the ballot you are
soliciting.

                       -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/