<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Request to Deny Multiple Votes/Registrar
At 04:07 PM 4/25/03 -0400, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
>My request to the ExecComm stands and failing that, I would note that I
>have not withdrawn my motion on the grounds that it is "cute". Something
>this serious requires the benefit of the more stringent voting
>requirements set forth in the draft bylaws. Until they are in place, I
>consider it highly inappropriate to undertake the ballot you are
>soliciting.
Dear Ross: If it takes a second to maintain the status quo (long since
decided), then you have my second. Regards, BobC, who opposes sneaking in
a change in what we have already decided.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|