Re: [registrars] WG: Redemption Grace Period

["Joyce Lin" <joyce@007names.com>]

Yes, the promise to correct the oversight was made at the DC meeting.  Did
we hear in Rio that the person made the promise in DC did not have the
authority and Chuck will give us an answer?  I was shocked to hear that.

Joyce L
007names.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
To: "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: [registrars] WG: Redemption Grace Period


> At 12:32 PM 5/13/03 +0200, Thomas Keller wrote:
> >  I would like to suggest that we move forward to initiate an Policy
> >Development Process with ICANN (or a reconsideration process I'm not sure
> >what is more
> >appropriate) to reinstate the "no charge five days pending delete period"
> >as already
> >voted upon by the RC
>
> Dear Thomas:  I think you are on the right track. One of the "registry"
> representatives who attended the second session of the February DC meeting
> advised that the omission of the 5 day *no charge* grace period was an
> oversight which he (and others?) made when reviewing Verisign's plans.  At
> that time, we were told that it could be restored.
>
> I have photos of almost all present at that meeting and I can provide one
> or more if of interest to the RC.
>
> Regards, BobC
>
>
>
>