<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Whois
...
> get out front on this issue. Mike held a meeting yesterday to discuss bulk
> whois, anonymous regisrations and potential models for providing modified
> access to whois data. Although IP, law enforcement, privacy advocates and
> certain registrars participated in the meeting (and some constructive
> discussion took place concerning the GNR tiered access model), the RC
...
Didn't we do this dance back in uwho-time, August, 2001? Three profoundly
silly VGRS-by-invite meetings [1].
The best line that came out of all that was Steven Metalitz claiming that
the meeting was a technical meeting, and that consistency and accuracy
in a distributed set of autonomous databases was a solved problem.
Leslie Daigle, Mark Koster, Bruce Tonkin and I actually didn't throw our
shoes at the man.
Lets not repeat the 2001 Who's-On-First tour.
Eric
[1] http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:ZccuwX4ZYTIJ:www.uwho.verisignlabs.com/Final-WhoIsPanel-Aug15-Resume.pdf+%2Buwho+%2Bverisign&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|