ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Some observations


>and ICANN approved them

There is no easy answer to verifying legitimate access. But I'm not
convinced ICANN is the one to do that. Since I might be able to
adequately verify law enforcement agencies in my own country, I would
prefer to see outside agencies working through them.

Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On
Behalf Of Paul Stahura
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 6:18 AM
To: 'Registrars@dnso.org'
Subject: RE: [registrars] Some observations

Yes, if they asked to be on the official list of ICANN-approved 
law-enforcement agencies, and ICANN approved them, and they paid the
$10K to
eNom

Paul



-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Keller [mailto:tom@schlund.de] 
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:51 AM
To: Paul Stahura
Cc: Registrars@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [registrars] Some observations


Am 11.06.2003 schrieb Paul Stahura:
> 3) To get bulk-whois information you must be law-enforcement.
Maintain
the
> $10K limit.

here is a question for you Paul, what would you do if a Thai 
law enforcement organisation would approach you to get Enom's
bulk whois. Would you grant them access to it?

Best,

tom

--

Thomas Keller

Domain Services
Schlund + Partner AG
Brauerstrasse 48         		Tel. +49-721-91374-534
76135 Karlsruhe, Germany               	Fax  +49-721-91374-215
http://www.schlund.de                  	tom@schlund.de      




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>