RE: [registrars] Can we have an announcement list?

["Rob Hall" <rob@momentous.com>]

Jim et al,

I would suspect every annoucement that I need to get would end up being
posted on both this list, and any new one.

The last thing I want is another list to monitor (even if it is announce
only).

I am not sure what the intent of the new list is.

If it is so you do not need to monitor the Registrars list, then logging
into a website hopefully would suffice for you.

If it is to make our proceedings more public, I would remind everyone that
our current list is open and available for anyone to read.

I know the Registrars list sometimes gets a little busy with active debate,
but the solution is not another list we all have to keep track of.

Rob.



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Elana Broitman
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 3:25 PM
To: Jim Archer; Registrar Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Can we have an announcement list?


Rick W - what's your recommendation?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Archer [mailto:jarcher@registrationtek.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 3:23 PM
To: Elana Broitman; Registrar Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Can we have an announcement list?


It would be better if the announcements came to us, rather than us
having
to check the web site daily.  I can host the list of that's the issue...


--On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 3:12 PM -0400 Elana Broitman
<ebroitman@register.com> wrote:

> Thanks Jim - Rick is looking into improving our website, which
> can/should include announcement updates.  Would that serve this goal?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Archer [mailto:jarcher@registrationtek.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:38 PM
> To: Registrar Constituency
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Can we have an announcement list?
>
>
> So exec committee, can we do this?  Yes?  No?  Do we need a formal
> motion?
>
> --On Friday, June 20, 2003 9:06 PM -0400 "Ross Wm. Rader"
> <ross@tucows.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/20/2003 7:58 PM Jim Archer noted that:
>>
>>
>>> What do people think?
>>
>> If that's a motion, then I second it. If its a suggestion, then I
>> support it. It might also be worthwhile to make it "ExComm
>> write"/"General Public read" - ie; only the excomm can post, but
>> anyone interested person in the universe can subscribe...subscription

>> volume won't have a bearing on list traffic and would add to the
>> transparency of our proceedings...
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> 	-rwr
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "In the modern world the intelligence of public opinion is the one
>> indispensable condition for social progress." 	- Charles W.
> Eliot (1834 -
>> 1926)
>
>
>
> *************************
> James W. Archer
> CEO
> http://www.RegistrationTek.com



*************************
James W. Archer
CEO
http://www.RegistrationTek.com