Re: [registrars] Can we have an announcement list?

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>]

best way to handle the announcements is to set up a special "subject header"
(this way the announcements can be more effectively filtered from the
general list..)

does this make any sense?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob Hall" <rob@momentous.com>
To: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>; "Registrar Constituency"
<registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: RE: [registrars] Can we have an announcement list?


> Jim et al,
>
> I would suspect every annoucement that I need to get would end up being
> posted on both this list, and any new one.
>
> The last thing I want is another list to monitor (even if it is announce
> only).
>
> I am not sure what the intent of the new list is.
>
> If it is so you do not need to monitor the Registrars list, then logging
> into a website hopefully would suffice for you.
>
> If it is to make our proceedings more public, I would remind everyone that
> our current list is open and available for anyone to read.
>
> I know the Registrars list sometimes gets a little busy with active
debate,
> but the solution is not another list we all have to keep track of.
>
> Rob.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Elana Broitman
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 3:25 PM
> To: Jim Archer; Registrar Constituency
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Can we have an announcement list?
>
>
> Rick W - what's your recommendation?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Archer [mailto:jarcher@registrationtek.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 3:23 PM
> To: Elana Broitman; Registrar Constituency
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Can we have an announcement list?
>
>
> It would be better if the announcements came to us, rather than us
> having
> to check the web site daily.  I can host the list of that's the issue...
>
>
> --On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 3:12 PM -0400 Elana Broitman
> <ebroitman@register.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jim - Rick is looking into improving our website, which
> > can/should include announcement updates.  Would that serve this goal?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Archer [mailto:jarcher@registrationtek.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:38 PM
> > To: Registrar Constituency
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] Can we have an announcement list?
> >
> >
> > So exec committee, can we do this?  Yes?  No?  Do we need a formal
> > motion?
> >
> > --On Friday, June 20, 2003 9:06 PM -0400 "Ross Wm. Rader"
> > <ross@tucows.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 6/20/2003 7:58 PM Jim Archer noted that:
> >>
> >>
> >>> What do people think?
> >>
> >> If that's a motion, then I second it. If its a suggestion, then I
> >> support it. It might also be worthwhile to make it "ExComm
> >> write"/"General Public read" - ie; only the excomm can post, but
> >> anyone interested person in the universe can subscribe...subscription
>
> >> volume won't have a bearing on list traffic and would add to the
> >> transparency of our proceedings...
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>
> >> -rwr
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "In the modern world the intelligence of public opinion is the one
> >> indispensable condition for social progress." - Charles W.
> > Eliot (1834 -
> >> 1926)
> >
> >
> >
> > *************************
> > James W. Archer
> > CEO
> > http://www.RegistrationTek.com
>
>
>
> *************************
> James W. Archer
> CEO
> http://www.RegistrationTek.com
>
>
>
>