RE: [ifwp] Re: Why was Draft 7 of the application not posted to the discuss list?

["Bernard Turcotte" <turcotte@canarie.ca>]

I would require a little more time please.

Should have comments in by the next 24 hours.

Bernard.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-participants@dnso.org [mailto:owner-participants@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Kent Crispin
> Sent: December 10, 1998 7:06 PM
> To: discuss@dnso.org; participants@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ifwp] Re: Why was Draft 7 of the application not posted to
> the discuss list?
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 06:48:06PM -0500, Michael Sondow wrote:
> > Kent Crispin a écrit:
> >
> > > So far there have been no comments on the participants list, and, on
> > > the questionable theory that silence is consent, I will post
> > > "version 7" to discuss later on tonight.
> >
> > I don't know about the others, but I am working on comments to draft 7.
> > You must give us a little time. 24 hours isn't enough. Believe it or
> > not, some of us have lives beyond the mailing lists :-]
>
> Yes, I am very well aware of that -- my wife reminds me frequently.
> Are your comments such that you think I should delay posting the
> draft to the discuss list?
>
> kent
>
> --
> Kent Crispin, PAB Chair				"Do good,
> and you'll be
> kent@songbird.com				lonesome." -- Mark Twain
>