[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ifwp] Re: Why was Draft 7 of the application not posted to the discuss list?
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 08:09:23 -0800
- From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Subject: Re: [ifwp] Re: Why was Draft 7 of the application not posted to the discuss list?
On Fri, Dec 11, 1998 at 09:26:32AM -0500, Bernard Turcotte wrote:
> I would require a little more time please.
>
> Should have comments in by the next 24 hours.
>
> Bernard.
OK, I have heard from Bernard and Michael that they have comments on
the draft.
I believe that should we publish the draft to the discuss list with the
caveat that these comments are coming, and that there may be some
changes as a result.
Consider the following points:
- nobody is going to be completely happy with this draft (I certainly
am not);
- it is out for wider discussion in any case;
- we need a wider participation in that discussion;
- there is not another proposal on the table that needs a contrasting
view;
- it is quite possible that there will be significant changes no
matter what;
- some of the participants are distributing the draft to others
anyway;
- people on the discuss list only are quite eager to comment;
- the draft still has explicit holes in it;
- there are major questions (like incorporation) that need to be
discussed;
- and TIME IS WASTING.
Email is a wonderful medium, but it only works well if things can
proceed in parallel.
It is clear that if we wait for comments from Michael and Bernard,
and then go through a period of discussion about them, that a week or
more will go by. I don't think we can afford that.
Comments?
--
Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain