Re: [ifwp] Re: The DNSO is a special interest group now

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@dninet.net>]

you seem to ignore the fact  that the largest group represented at both the
monterrey and barcelona meetings was the CCTLD members. the wwtld and
individuals from many of the cctlds were there in force.

it sounds like maybe you have another agenda here william ...

ken stubbs


-----Original Message-----
From: William X. Walsh <william@tjns.tj>
To: IFWP Discussion List <list@ifwp.org>
Cc: domain-policy@lists.internic.net <domain-policy@lists.internic.net>;
list@ifwp.org <list@ifwp.org>; discuss@dnso.org <discuss@dnso.org>
Date: Thursday, December 17, 1998 4:15 AM
Subject: [ifwp] Re: The DNSO is a special interest group now


>
>>>I guess that first we should agree whehter the current draft is up for
>>>publication to the "genreal public" (and I hope we will concur SHORTLY on
>>>this).
>
>This is the statement that is being used to describe those not on the
internal
>closed list.  "The General Public."
>
>Not "Stakeholders"
>
>This alone speaks volumes.
>
>Until they recognize significantly that others besides themselves are
>stakeholders who MUST be represented in the forming of this group, they are
>serving only their own needs, which is the promotion of the CORE/PAB
structure
>at the expense of the rest of the stakeholders, and indeed the entire
internet
>user community.
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>William X. Walsh (WXW7/WW1506)| TJ Network Services - The .TJ NIC
>Network Operations            | http://tjns.tj / http://nic.tj
>william@tjns.tj/william@nic.tj| Domain Names, DNS, Email,
>+1-(209)-493-6144             | DynamicDNS & Web Hosting Services
>-----------------------------------------------------------------