Michael and all, Haven't we ben here before with the time driving the process? Is this a wise an prudent practice? You be the judge.... Michael Sondow wrote: > I sent this yesterday to the participants list, but since there has not > been any response to it there I am re-submitting it to the discuss list. > ..................................................................... > > Kent Crispin a écrit: > > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 1998 at 04:16:16PM +0100, Robert Shaw wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > At request of Jon Englund from ITAA, I've added him to > > > the <participants@dnso.org> mailing list. > > > > > > Jon is organizing a DNSO related meeting in Washington, > > > D.C. on January 22, 1999. > > > > Oh -- is it now the 22nd? > > There won't be enough time to incorporate what that meeting produces > into the application. It's too late. The DNSO will be forced to accept > everything, without discussion and consensus, just because of the time > problem. This may well be why they put it off until the end of January. > The DNSO should not go along with this, IMHO. Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature