Amadeu and all, None of this justified them being added when others cannot be on that list as well. For instance myself. As I am spokesman for the single largest group in these discussions I believe as do our group, that I should be added to the "Participants List" as well. Amadeu Abril i Abril wrote: > Jay Fenello wrote: > > > > Over the last couple of days, I've seen many > > additions to the participants list like this > > one. It appears that people are being added > > who did not attend an officially sanctioned > > DNSO event. > > > > Since I was not at Montery, I don't know this > > for certain. Could someone please confirm or > > deny that this is happening? > > Hi Jay, > > Yes, in the recent days some people have been added to the list. Joe Alhadeff > and Jon Englund are coordinating an effort to bring some mainly US-based > arties that had not participated in the DNSO effrt to the table. As they also > think (and many other agree) that sort of a new meeting should be held > (Janauary 22 at Washington DC) and they are somehow the "local organizers" > their presence here is pergeclty justified, I think. CIX who was strongly > encouraged to attend both Barcelona and Monterrey meetings has also requested > to be added (thru Eric Lee). Finally Jo Sims has been put on the list. > > I think that all their presneces are more than justified, eityher as > partiicpnats or as listeners (as I guess Joe Simms will behave, but htis is > just a guess). > > We need coordination with ICANN. ICANN has to know what the relevant SO > efforts are considering (in terms or cincorporation or not, for instance; or > funding). Joe A and Jon are coordinating a serious effort to bring to the > discussion some of the previously absent parties. CIX is certainly one of them.... > > In the sake of speed, time and communication I favour their presence. They are > exactly the kind of people that we all wnated here fomr the vbery beginning. > > But all their additions have been announced so anyone can raise an objection. > If this is the case, we *all* will consider it. > > If your question is: could someone form OR¡SC join= the anser is clearly yes, > as ORSC has participated through verious people (you and Stef) to the > meetings. If you ask whether my aunt will join, the answer is "no". > > A bit of flexivility is required. You were appointed to the Monterrey > organisng committee, but when you relized that you were not able to come, you > asked to be replaced by Stef. It was done so, depsite the fact that the > participants had never appointed him, in fact they did not knew that the > change was made. But the relevant question was that it was important not to > irritate you on a purly procedural (and allegedly minor) trick ;-))) > > Regards, > > Amadeu > > __________________________________________________ > To receive the digest version instead, send a > blank email to ifwp-digest@lists.interactivehq.org > > To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to: > subscribe-IFWP@lists.interactivehq.org > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to: > unsubscribe-ifwp@lists.interactivehq.org > > Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email andy@interactivehq.org. > ___END____________________________________________ Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature