[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: additional drafts for dnso
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:16:27 +0100
- From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <svl@nrw.net>
- Subject: RE: additional drafts for dnso
On 27 Jan 99, at 15:53, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
Hallo Roberto,
I did post it first on discuss, did not see anything, probably not on the list.
then I postet it to participants :-)
as I see it they are even not similar, I am creating mess...
siegfried
> Stef,
>
> Just for curiosity, why did you answer Siegfried's post on
> discuss@dnso.org on ORSC+participants@dnso.org? ;>)
>
> Roberto
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Einar Stefferud [SMTP:Stef@nma.com]
> > Sent: 26 January 1999 22:27
> > To: Siegfried Langenbach
> > Cc: participants@dnso.org; domain-policy@open-rsc.org
> > Subject: Re: additional drafts for dnso
> >
> > For whatever it is worth, ORSC will work on incorporating ideas from the
> > CENTR and AIP drafts into the composite ORSC MELDED DRAFT.
> >
> > Plus any useful ideas that will come from the ConfCall of today.
> >
> > Cheers...\Stef
> >
> > From your message Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:29:40 +0100:
> > }
> > }
> > }Hallo,
> > }
> > }after having time (and some discussions with others) to think I have
> > }some reflections on the washington meeting of jan 22.
> > }
> > }I am a bit concerned about CENTR presenting an own, separate approach.
> > }
> > }after enwrapping the nice things these draft has, I see here mainly the
> > }intention to give registrars and registries the power of dnso. As I
> > }believe that names are common good, its hard for me to accept these
> > }position (we should also remember that isp=B4s and registrars are to a
> > gr=
> > }eat
> > }extend similar, a problem which already exists in the mty-draft).
> > }
> > }more important is the fact that CENTR, not achieving their goals in the
> > }common meetings in negotiations with the other parties, is now
> > }splitting the process. that is a bad move and could result in others
> > }doing the
> > same.
> > }that is leading to nowhere.
> > }
> > }I recognize that there are parties who prefer a non-effective dnso, I
> > }would be sorry to see CENTR in that corner.
> > }
> > }siegfried
> > }
> > }
>