Re: additional drafts for dnso

[Einar Stefferud <Stef@nma.com>]

Hi Roberto -- Because I believe this consensus generating process is
greatly improved by spreading the discussion to the far corners of the
stakeholder community.  The m9ore we share and spread common ideas,
the faster we can converge and the more we can improve the result.

So, why do you ask?  Did I violate some unwritten rule about keepings
things compartmentalized among factions?

Cheers...\Stef

>From your message Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:53:47 +0100:
}
}Stef,
}
}Just for curiosity, why did you answer Siegfried's post on discuss@dnso.org
}on ORSC+participants@dnso.org? ;>)
}
}Roberto
}
}
}> -----Original Message-----
}> From:	Einar Stefferud [SMTP:Stef@nma.com]
}> Sent:	26 January 1999 22:27
}> To:	Siegfried Langenbach
}> Cc:	participants@dnso.org; domain-policy@open-rsc.org
}> Subject:	Re: additional drafts for dnso 
}> 
}> For whatever it is worth, ORSC will work on incorporating ideas from
}> the CENTR and AIP drafts into the composite ORSC MELDED DRAFT.
}> 
}> Plus any useful ideas that will come from the ConfCall of today.
}> 
}> Cheers...\Stef
}> 
}> From your message Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:29:40 +0100:
}> }
}> }
}> }Hallo,
}> }
}> }after having time (and some discussions with others) to think I have some
}> }reflections on the washington meeting of jan 22.
}> }
}> }I am a bit concerned about CENTR presenting an own, separate approach.
}> }
}> }after enwrapping the nice things these draft has, I see here mainly the
}> }intention to give registrars and registries the power of dnso. As I
}> }believe that names are common good, its hard for me to accept these
}> }position (we should also remember that isp=B4s and registrars are to a
}> gr=
}> }eat
}> }extend similar, a problem which already exists in the mty-draft).
}> }
}> }more important is the fact that CENTR, not achieving their goals in the
}> }common meetings in negotiations with the other parties, is now splitting
}> }the process. that is a bad move and could result in others doing the
}> same.
}> }that is leading to nowhere.
}> }
}> }I recognize that there are parties who prefer a non-effective dnso, I
}> }would be sorry to see CENTR in that corner.
}> }
}> }siegfried
}> }
}> }