Re: [dnso.discuss] Modifications to ICIIU Guidelines and NCDNHC definition

[william@dso.net (William X. Walsh)]

Prove it or go away.

Nothing I said was false.  And you know you can't prove otherwise.

You count on people not knowing the full details to give credibility
to your vague comments trying to discount the legitimate points being
addressed.

It doesn't work, Jeffrey, or is it KCKid, or Brian Hollingsworth, or
one of any number of other psuedonyms you have used that we are not
even aware of...........



On Mon, 31 May 1999 03:44:18 +0100, Jeff Williams
<jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>All,
>
>  Yet again it seems that Mr. Wlash is engaging in posing false aspersions.
>This has been his habit, and it appears as though this habit continues.  Another
>
>sad and unfortunate commentary in this persons skewed and disgusting
>participation in these discussions.
>
>William X. Walsh wrote:
>
>> INEG doesn't exist (see http://www.dso.net/wwalsh/jeffw/)
>>
>> And you still haven't answered the points that were brought up in this
>> post and the original ones prior to this.
>>
>> As for Richard, I only saw a broad statement of support for his
>> efforts, and not that he was participating in its decisions.
>>
>> The leader of a congress only speaks for it on matters that the
>> congress as agreed on.
>>
>> As I said, I still see no evidence of the ICIIU being a membership
>> organization, and if it is, then its membership needs to be addresses
>> as far as electing a leadership.  The membership guidelines of this
>> supposed Congress of users have never been published either.
>>
>> Smells like a fish........
>>
>> On Mon, 31 May 1999 03:00:28 +0100, Jeff Williams
>> <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>> >William and all,
>> >
>> >  Again William as I have now pointed out for the third time you missed
>> >Richards earlier post of a similar thread as well as post early last week
>> >regarding the INEGroup's support for the work the Michael has already done,
>> >
>> >not to mention the minuets from the Berlin meeting as well..
>> >
>> >  Please William, please try to pay closer attention to the events.  I
>> >realize
>> >that they are moving at a fairly quick pace and it is difficult to keep
>> >up, but i am sure that if you make a effort, you can accomplish it....
>> >
>> >William X. Walsh wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 31 May 1999 02:36:14 +0100, Jeff Williams
>> >> <jwkckid1@IX.NETCOM.COM> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Rick and all,
>> >> >
>> >> >  Well Ricky old boy, it seems like you have not bee paying attention.
>> >> >The ICIIU is NOT just a single person...
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I have yet to see evidence of that.
>> >>
>> >> Any "congress" cannot endorse or modify positions based on the
>> >> opinions and thoughts of a single person, as it is clear what is
>> >> happening with the "positions" being published under the nom "ICIIU."
>> >>
>> >> So as usual, Jeff, you are spointing off without any supporting facts.
>> >>
>> >> ICANN comments removed from CC, they have enough to do without needing
>> >> a copy of every message in these threads.  Including them in any
>> >> response was irresponsible.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> William X. Walsh william@dso.net
>> >> General Manager, DSo Internet Services
>> >> Fax:(209) 671-7934
>> >>
>> >> The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go
>> >> crying to every time you have something
>> >> to whimper about.
>> >
>> >Regards,
>>
>> --
>> William X. Walsh william@dso.net
>> General Manager, DSo Internet Services
>> Fax:(209) 671-7934
>>
>> The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go
>> crying to every time you have something
>> to whimper about.
>
>Regards,


--
William X. Walsh william@dso.net
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Fax:(209) 671-7934

The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go 
crying to every time you have something 
to whimper about.