[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions

To: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>
Subject: Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 08:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: wg-b@dnso.org
References: <m11Mh2H-00000fC@roam.psg.com><3.0.32.19990901163312.006b2c2c@pop.enteract.com><4.2.0.58.19990902110112.01cf4550@dokka.maxware.no><3.0.2.32.19990903105225.00d3d11c@pop.interport.net>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

if the law to protect these marks already exists, what need is there for
icann to do anything other than it already plans, which is to have the
dispute resolution process be based upon law?

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>

References:
- Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
  - From: eileen kent <eileenk@enteract.com>
- Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@alvestrand.no>
- Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>

Prev by Date: [wg-b] "Oops" domains
Next by Date: Re: [wg-b] "Oops" domains
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
Next by thread: Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread